The United States Denies Entry Permits to Former European Union Official and Additional Figures Over Social Media Rules

Former Regulator speaking at an event
The former top tech regulator, has previously clashed with the owner of platform X.

The US State Department declared it would deny visas to a group of five people, including a former EU commissioner, for reportedly seeking to "pressure" US-based online companies into silencing viewpoints they disagree with.

"These radical activists and aggressive non-profits have advanced suppression campaigns by other governments - in each case targeting US voices and American companies," remarked US diplomat the official.

The former European tech regulator remarked that a "witch hunt" was underway.

Officials labeled Breton as the "mastermind" of the European Union's online content law, which enforces content moderation on social media firms.

A Divisive Regulation

Yet, it has angered certain right-leaning Americans who view it as seeking to censor conservative viewpoints. EU authorities denies this.

The official has been in conflict with Elon Musk, owner of platform X, over obligations to adhere to European regulations.

EU regulators imposed a penalty on X €120m over its verification system – the inaugural penalty under the DSA. It said the platform's system was "misleading" because the firm was not "meaningfully verifying users".

In response, Musk's site prevented the Commission from making adverts on its platform.

Reactions and Broader Bans

Reacting to the visa ban, the former commissioner wrote on X: "Addressing the US: Speech suppression does not lie where you think it is."

Another listed individual, who leads the UK-based Global Disinformation Index (GDI), was also listed.

A senior US diplomat the official accused the GDI of using US taxpayer money "to encourage censorship and targeting of US expression and press".

A GDI spokesperson said the entry bans as "a repressive move on free speech and an egregious act of government censorship".

"Their actions today are immoral, unlawful, and un-American," they stated.

Imran Ahmed of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a non-governmental organization that fights digital hatred and false information, was similarly issued a ban.

Rogers labeled Mr Ahmed a "key collaborator with campaigns to weaponize the government against American people".

Also subject to bans were Anna-Lena von Hodenberg and Josephine Ballon of HateAid, which the State Department said helped enforce the DSA.

Responding, the two leaders called it an "act of repression by a administration that is increasingly disregarding the rule of law".

"We will not be intimidated by a government that uses accusations of censorship to silence those who stand up for fundamental freedoms," they added.

Policy Justification

Rubio said that steps had been taken to impose visa restrictions on "representatives of the global censorship-industrial complex" who would be "generally barred from entering the United States".

"The administration has been explicit that his national sovereignty foreign policy opposes infringements of US autonomy. Extraterritorial overreach by foreign censors targeting US expression is unacceptable," he added.

Christopher Calderon
Christopher Calderon

A seasoned travel writer and casino enthusiast, sharing insights from global luxury destinations and high-roller experiences.